“Gistmass rhymes with Christmas, which embodies the same memes. The name Gistmass combines two words. Gist is the essence of a matter, and matter has mass. Hence, the meaning of Gistmass is gift culture emerges from practice of gift principles.” – UV Faust, Gistmass Story
“Antimatter Hypothesis: A Viral Thought Experiment” has been published in book form on the Internet today. Simply stated the Antimatter Hypothesis assumes parity between matter and antimatter in the universe. The implications are revolutionary. The book comes in two parts and takes some time to load with images and embedded video, so you need to use a high speed Internet connection. Click on the image at left to load Part 1, which deals with the Anti-Matter Matter Object (AMMO) phenomena. At the end of Part 1 is the link to Part 2, which deals with Antimatter Cosmology.
On my first day of college, my honors calculus professor, Galen Shorack, strode into the classroom, picked up a piece of chalk, and wrote on the blackboard, “We believe in the real numbers.” His message integrated profound insights. Mathematics resides in the realm of metaphysics. Mathematics is a belief system built upon discovery, upon revelation, not invention or manufacture. The fruits of mathematical labor are verified by agreement with real world facts, but in and of themselves the manipulation of numbers and symbols are representational, not real.
The way people use language communicates hidden meaning. I found English composition class, in junior high school, an enlightening experience. Everybody penned the same introductory topic, “How I Spent My Summer Vacation,” with pathetic results. My classmates couldn’t stick two coherent thoughts together in one complete sentence. Superglue hadn’t been invented yet. So each I-did-this, I-did-that list lacked structure, cohesion, or interest.
What happened outside of my classmates bore greater interest than what happened within them. This trend held true through my tenth year high school reunion and beyond. Results of a decade milestone survey were published alongside pictures of attendees. By then superglue had been invented, but to no avail. Eventually organizers caught on, because the writing prerequisite was dropped from future reunions to the relief of many. I was always an exception. On an unrelated occasion, while I helped my eldest sister move, Mary’s husband Steve said to me, “When taking something heavy, put something light on top.” He could have been describing the writing style I tried to cultivate from the beginning: deep and entertaining.
The youngest of four siblings, by the time I was born my eldest sister and brother had mastered sarcasm. So from the get go I had to understand hidden meanings to learn language. For example, on my eighteenth birthday the Twenty-Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified. That tells you something about me, but only indirectly. My first insight in writing compelling compositions was a knack for identifying lousy sentences. To unblock my muse, I struggled to fashion catchy beginnings. I modeled my compositions on stories with surprise endings, not lists, and I loathed lists of boring sentences.
Our composition teacher made overtures to inspire her students. She granted us personal choice from five new titles to spark each assignment. Typically one and only one title ever appealed to me. “What I Saw on the Moon” remains the only topic I retain as a distinct memory. Since at that time nobody had yet been to the moon, I contrived a story wrapper introducing a relative of mine, from the future, who communicated through me what he saw on the moon. Then in my conclusion I woke up, as if from a dream.
In-between, I described a creature. My brother authored the description and deserves full credit. His curiosity overcame him during a writing break at dinnertime. He read my incomplete story up to the point where the creature appeared. Following my brother’s suggestion, the creature “pranced about like an elephant stuck in a refrigerator.” You might think this tells a whole lot more about my brother than the creature, but I’d wager you couldn’t be too sure. My brother was an avid viewer of the Steve Allen Show. With audience participation, the TV host often constructed what we now call Mad Libs, although I prefer to call them Allenisms, which rhymes with Aneurysms. That’s as far as I’ll go in trying to explain my brother.
But notice the description. The creature “pranced about like an elephant stuck in a refrigerator.” It does nothing to convey the creature’s appearance; rather it describes its behavior. So from the creature’s description you can’t picture it. Surprise! In fact it’s incomprehensible, which is the point. After all, what’d you expect to see on the moon? At face value, no pattern exists in the choice of words. This is the random nature of Allenisms. But order does exist in the parts of speech, which is the structural integrity underlying Allenisms. What an Allenism is missing is any sensible context connecting the choice of words. It’s the random words that stand out, attracting attention initially, and subsequently for those totally lacking in mental discipline.
Throwing away the words and filling in the blanks, consistent with the surrounding context, reveals the hidden meaning disguised by Allenisms. Communication is the art of synchronizing thoughts and emotions with other people in a common context. But often the context isn’t understood, so miscommunication occurs. The allure of Allenisms is that they return us to the state of childhood, when parents purposely spelled words out loud to communicate in code what wasn’t meant for children’s enquiring minds. Even to adults, Allenisms sometimes sound suggestive and appeal to our sense of adult content, a nearly lost art of growing up.
People spell the word “cookie” in front of their dogs to avoid the conditioned Pavlovian response. Dogs don’t understand context, and I haven’t yet met a dog that could spell. Persuasion is the art of discovering what means “cookie” to other people, then embedding it inside self-serving contexts. As Napoleon Bonaparte phrased it, “You can get a man to do practically anything for a small piece of colored ribbon.”
Allenisms are related to idiomatic expressions, which exist within shared linguistic and cultural contexts, e.g. like a fish out of water, like a cat on a hot tin roof. These examples describe distressing circumstances. Useful as shortcuts, they communicate feelings of frustration, a condition often hard to express in words. In a sense they’re euphemisms, strange yet familiar stand-ins for difficult emotions. Cross breeding idiomatic expressions might produce Allenisms, of a sort, e.g. like a fish on a hot tin roof, like a cat out of water. But Allenisms must be incomprehensible and without discernible context, the placeholders of hidden meaning. Valid contexts differentiate idiomatic expressions from Allenisms. One way to mentally bridge this gap is to rediscover a lost context, e.g. my classmates adopted the status quo of conformity and avoidance like a cat out of water, whereas I was driven by a thirst for emergence and immersion like a fish on a hot tin roof.
Likewise, the creature’s description exhibits a context, albeit a private one. In my youth, elephant jokes were the rage. “How can you tell if an elephant has been in your refrigerator?” “By the footprints in the butter.” So a creature “prancing about like an elephant stuck in a refrigerator” isn’t devoid of cultural significance, no matter how many raw impressions to the contrary. However, the creature’s description does contain ambiguities that confuse context, presenting a litmus test to readers. It’s not apparent whether the refrigerator prances about of its own volition, or whether some cause and effect relationship on the part of the elephant is responsible for this observed behavior.
What is apparent is that this frustrating configuration inhibits both the refrigerator and the elephant from becoming self-actualized. Some would blame the elephant for inhibiting the refrigerator, contradicting those who would blame the refrigerator for inhibiting the elephant, while still others would seek to analyze how the elephant got stuck in the refrigerator in the first place before fixing blame. Blame stems from exclusionary, cause and effect worldviews which I reject on rationally supportable grounds. A systems perspective serves my muse better. It requires that I try to wrap my mind around the whole problem space, while striving to see the big picture on the Tao to transcendence – not an easy task by any standard.
One way to make sense of the creature’s description is to think of the whole exercise as participating in the child’s game of telephone. Although it’s a given that the initial message is understandable, after passing through relays, the translation coming out the other end is distorted beyond recognition, with the original meaning being lost. But can its true meaning ever be reconstructed? In hindsight, I think it can. My past self’s future relative is the source of the creature’s description. Who is he? The straightforward evidence appears in the title, “What I Saw on the Moon.” Therefore, in a relativistic sense, my past self’s future relative is me in the present. My brother is my relative; and I am my brother’s relative, which accounts for my past self’s confusion.
The Apollo moon landings commenced when I was in high school. I watched them live on TV. The final moon mission concluded during my college years. I was surprised to hear rumors that the moon landings were faked, supposedly enacted on a secret sound stage someplace on earth. Even today students argue the flag was waving in the breeze. In a real vacuum on the moon, of course, it couldn’t. So, as the conspiracy theory goes, the whole thing must’ve been special effects. Therefore, according to doubters, it didn’t really happen.
I worked in Hollywood doing visual effects in the 1980s, and we didn’t have the technology to fake the moon landings then. High speed cameras would have been required to get the slow motion look of lower gravity. Back then this could only have been done with film, passing film through the camera faster than normal. But film to video transfer looks different than straight video, and the moon landings were broadcast in video. I’m convinced American ingenuity planted the flag on the moon. As for the waving of the flag, a pendulum will sustain its motion longer in a vacuum. It was just vibrations not wind. From my perspective, NASA’s Apollo missions accomplished their goal: to land men on the moon and bring them back safely.
Mythbusters Moon Myths
Non parallel shadows
Fill light in shadows
Moon boot print
Waving flag
Walking in Moon gravity
So how does my story end? Wake up. This isn’t a dream. The mysterious creature resides here on Earth, not on the Moon. The elephant is the symbol of the Republican Party, political puppet of wealthy special interests. Plutocracy and Capitalism are relics of Feudalism. The elephant is trapped in a class struggle, where no resolution will transform the sealed refrigerator into a coffin. To transcend this class struggle we must look at the creature from another perspective.
Here the refrigerator signifies a box, where brainstorming an exit strategy requires thinking outside the box. However, elephants learn to obey human masters. Shackled to a stake in the ground, a baby elephant learns to surrender all attempts at escape, because no amount of exertion can break free from the shackle, but circumstances change when a baby grows into an adult. In the new context, an adult elephant could easily pull up the stake and gain freedom, but the adult never questions the lesson learned as a baby. An elephant never forgets, despite the fact that insight could liberate the elephant from bondage. As imagined, I saw the whole spectacle from a distant time and place. Hence, novel insights expose hidden meanings and opportunities.
If a male is an electron, then electrons repel each other, but together they perform work in the form of electricity. If women are protons then women form nuclear bonds with other women and couples. Couples are neutrons, which are the combination of an electron plus a proton plus an antineutrino. An antineutrino is therefore love.
The half life of a neutron is the amount of time a couple remains together or until at least one half of the partners becomes disaffect and the relationship deteriorates. Unconditional love is a neutron with an infinite half life. A mother and a son also form a neutron.
Beta decay is the decay of a neutron into a proton and an electron. When a boy reaches puberty he tends to go his own way and the bond with his mother weakens.
Girlfriends form nuclear bonds. A mother daughter pair forms a nuclear bond.
The Oedipus story can be modeled in this way. The father feels threatened by his son. A prophesy claims that the son will displace the father, so the father sends the son away to his death. Oedipus does not die, but is adopted, grows up, leaves home, and meets his biological father on the road, where he slays him. In time he marries his mother.
A neutron is formed by one and only one pair of an electron and a proton. The idea is sound, but in real life the parent's intimate relationship resumes once the kids are asleep in bed. Instead of all or nothing, the mother/wife has two roles.
Another Greek myth is that of Odysseus, who goes off to the Trojan War leaving his wife Penelope and young son Telemachus. The war lasts ten years, and is recounted in Homer's Iliad. It took him another ten years to get home as recounted in Homer's Odyssey. By then Telemachus was twenty. When Odysseus returns he fights and kills Penelope’s suitors. Other stories say that Odysseus and Penelope have another son, and Odysseus leaves home again. As a corollary to the Oedipus complex, I offer the Penelope complex where the birth of a son displaces the husband in his relationship with his wife, and drives him away.
I define a neutron relationship, as an intimate relationship between a man and a woman. A hydrogen atom also contains an electron and a proton, but they are not as strongly bound as they are in a neutron. Statistics show that half of all hydrogen atoms end in ionization, i.e. half of all marriages end in divorce.
How do you describe a picture to a blind person? Searching for common ground and struggling to communicate through analogies must suffice. Imagine that someday we encounter an advanced alien race like the Asgard from the SciFi Channel series Stargate SG-1. This technologically advanced race reproduces through cloning. They fully comprehend mathematics, physics, chemistry, and electronics; but they fail to fathom, on any basis whatsoever, human relationships.
You independently decide you’ll attempt to bridge this communication gap. Your breakthrough comes when you consider subatomic particles, the constituents of matter. Electrons are small and mobile like male sperm. Protons are more massive like female ova, and protons are located in the atomic nucleus like a social unit. Not only do you find this analogy intriguing. In fact, it proves compelling and you’ve discovered a profound paradigm for understanding human relationships.
So you create cross reference dictionaries between physics and human relationships, based upon subatomic particles. In addition, you craft an algebraic notation, employing logical operations from mathematics, to encode the dynamics of human relationships on a micro scale. Furthermore, you develop cross reference dictionaries between chemistry and human relationships, based upon atomic elements and molecular bonds, to describe human social units on a macro scale, while producing cross reference dictionaries between electronics and human relationships to cover workplace interactions. As an extension you discover analogies to successfully explain the dynamics of more complex human relationships involving belief systems.
Your efforts exceed all expectations. Truth is more elusive than a needle in a haystack; since both the needle and the haystack are invisible, where truth’s concerned. However; once you’ve grasped the truth it’s generally quite simple, and powerful beyond belief. Ascending to the peak of a mountaintop, your perspective becomes unobstructed in all directions. This view is truly awesome. Let’s ask our friends to come join us. Shall we?
My apology caught her by surprise. After a couple of weeks consulting for a company, I suggested a redesign of their entire software product line; unifying their various data formats to make the data interchangeable between all their products. A woman was head of customer service. She resisted my idea saying that their customers liked the products the way they were.
That night I pondered how to reason with her. Instead I remembered reading a book in high school. The book was “On Aggression” by Konrad Lorenz. I realized this woman was acting territorially. She was defending what was familiar territory to her. I was new. I was telling them to change, but I had merit on my side. To me it was obvious. I had an outsider’s perspective with no vested interests. The book I read also covered dominance and submission in animal behavior.
Next morning I walked into her office. I intentionally met her on her own turf. Her body language reacted defensively. I said, “I apologize.” I told her that I needed her input on satisfying customer needs. Her body language changed to cooperation. She said she had thought about my proposal and agreed that it made sense. I won without a battle, because I realized the real argument was not about the merits of my proposal but about territory. I figuratively groveled before her and surrendered all claims on her territory, and she conceded technical superiority to me. It was a win-win bloodless coup, and I gained an ally that day, by simply demonstrating respect.
Many arguments derive from misunderstandings not just conflicting opinions or values. Partnerships that don’t share common values are probably doomed. In this particular incident common ground was achieved; but it’s not always that simple, or even possible in many cases. Emotional detachment is a male trait. I looked at the problem in technical terms. Women don't tend to approach life the same way. Recognizing this gender difference was the key to overcoming a major obstacle in our working relationship.
Posts
“Antimatter Hypothesis: A Viral Thought Experiment” has been published in book form on the Internet today. Simply stated the Antimatter Hypothesis assumes parity between matter and antimatter in the universe. The implications are revolutionary. The book comes in two parts and takes some time to load with images and embedded video, so you need to use a high speed Internet connection. Click on the image at left to load Part 1, which deals with the Anti-Matter Matter Object (AMMO) phenomena. At the end of Part 1 is the link to Part 2, which deals with Antimatter Cosmology.
